Berkeley Technology Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive & Editorial Board
    • How To Join
    • Sponsors
    • Subscribe
      • Print Edition
      • Email Updates
      • RSS Feed
  • Journal
    • All Journal Archives
  • Annual Review
    • Archives
  • Commentaries
    • Financial Services Risk Management Framework
    • Copyright Small Claims
    • USPTO Patent Quality
      • PTO Comments
      • BTLJ Comments
    • Archives
  • Symposia
    • 2017 Symposium: Platform Law
    • Archives
  • BTLJ Blog
    • All Blog Posts
    • BTLJ Student Podcast
  • Submissions
  • Alumni
Berkeley Technology Law Journal
Berkeley Technology Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Executive & Editorial Board
    • How To Join
    • Sponsors
    • Subscribe
      • Print Edition
      • Email Updates
      • RSS Feed
  • Journal
    • All Journal Archives
  • Annual Review
    • Archives
  • Commentaries
    • Financial Services Risk Management Framework
    • Copyright Small Claims
    • USPTO Patent Quality
      • PTO Comments
      • BTLJ Comments
    • Archives
  • Symposia
    • 2017 Symposium: Platform Law
    • Archives
  • BTLJ Blog
    • All Blog Posts
    • BTLJ Student Podcast
  • Submissions
  • Alumni
RECENT
Featured, Journal, Symposia

Volume 36, Design Patents Symposium

February 8, 2022

COMPLETE VOLUME 36, DESIGN PATENTS SYMPOSIUM

  • Complete Volume

FRONT MATTER

  • Front Matter

ARTICLES

  • Design Patent Law’s Identity Crisis
    by Peter S. Menell & Ella Corren
  • A Primer on Design Patent Functionality
    by Perry J. Saidman
  • Design Patents Are Theft, Not Just A “Fraud-Upon the Public,” Who Need Legislation to Restore Their Repair Rights
    by Joshua D. Sarnoff
  • Fixing Functionality in Design Patent Law
    by Mark P. McKenna
  • All or Nothing at All: Design Patent’s Ornamentality Requirement and the Failings of Feature Filtration
    by Christopher V. Carani
  • The Design Patent Emperor Wears No Clothes: Responding to Advocates of Design Patent Protection for Functionality
    by Peter S. Menell & Ella Corren
  • Why the Future of Design Patent Protections Will Rely on Modern Neuroscience, Not Constitutional and Legal Reversionism
    by Charles L. Mauro & Christopher Morley
  • Share
Previous Article

Quantum Computing and Intellectual Property Law

Read More
Next Article

Berkeley Technology Law Journal Podcast: A Look into the California Privacy Protection Agency with Chairperson Jennifer Urban

Read More

Search BTLJ

BTLJ Archives

Search BTLJ.org

Tag Cloud

4th Amendment 9th Circuit AIA Antitrust Apple BCLT BTLJ Blog California constitutionality consumer privacy rights copyright Copyright law criminal procedure cybersecurity data DMCA Due Process fair use Federal Circuit First Amendment first sale FTC generic drug Google infringement international Internet legislation licensing litigation patent Patent Law patent litigation patent reform patent troll privacy public performance software software patents statutory damages Supreme Court surveillance tracking trademark Wiretap Act

Contact

Berkeley Technology Law Journal
U.C. Berkeley School of Law
Student Center, Ste. 3
Berkeley, California 94720-7200
btlj@berkeley.edu

Join BTLJ

Membership in BTLJ is open to all students at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Students interested in joining should e-mail btlj@berkeley.edu.

webmaster@btlj.org

© 2022 Berkeley Technology Law Journal. All rights reserved.